Test anvelope vara 225/40 R18 – Auto Zeitung 2021
Va propunem un Test anvelope vara 225/40 R18 – Auto Zeitung 2021. In acest an, testul a inceput devreme, Auto Zeitung publicand rezultatele celor 10 anvelope testate.
Toate testele au fost efectuate utilizand un autoturism Seat Leon FR, cu populara dimensiune de 225/40 R18 UHP, ce echipeaza din ce in ce mai multe autoturisme sportive de dimensiune medie, cum ar fi popularul Vw Golf, seria 1 de la BMW, Audi TT si altele.
Testele pe carosabil uscat
La fel ca si anul trecut, anvelopa francezilor Michelin Pilot Sport 4 a obtinut cele mai bune rezultate in aceasta categorie cu o diferenta destul de mare fata de ocupantul locului 2 Continental PremiumContact 6. Maxxis a obtinut de asemenea un rezultat excelent, cu noua lor anvelopa Maxxis Victra Sport 5.
Manevrabilitatea pe carosabil uscat a fost adjudecata de Continental Premium Contact 6, cu niste rezultate impresionante la viraje bruste si cu o precizie foarte buna. Michelin, Maxxis, Goodyear si Hankook au fost foarte aproape unele de celelalte, formand un grup compact.
Testele pe carosabil umed
Goodyear si Continental sunt conducatorii grupei urmati indeaproape de anvelopa celor de la Falken, cu impresionanta FK510.
Manevrabilitatea pe carosabil umed aduce un alt castigator, de aceasta data Pirelli P Zero PZ4. Nokian si Michelin, care au performat foarte bine in acest test, au ocupat locurile 2 si 3.
Dunlop, care a obtinut rezultate bune pe uscat, dar nu stralucite, are cea mai buna rezistenta impotriva acvaplanarii.
Testele de zgomot
Pentru a avea un confort cat mai sporit, anvelopele trebuie sa fie cat mai silentioase atunci cand ruleaza pe carosabil. Anvelopa celor de la Nexen s-a dovedit a fi cea mai silentioasa din test.
Rezistenta la rulare
Dunlop a castigat la o a doua categorie de teste, avand cea mai mica rezistenta la rulare. Acest lucru se traduce printr-un consum mai mic de combustibil. Pe de alta parte, Falken, Nexen si in particular Pirelli, au avut o rezistenta la rulare semnificativ mai mare.
Rezultate Test anvelope vara 225/40 R18 – Auto Zeitung 2021
Locul 1 – GOODYEAR Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
TEST | Loc | Diferenta | % |
Dry Braking | 4th | +0.8 M | 97.72% |
Dry Handling | 4th | +0.3 s | 99.57% |
Subj. Dry Handling | 2nd | -1 Points | |
Wet Braking | 1st | 1 | |
Wet Handling | 7th | +0.8 s | 98.74% |
Subj. Wet Handling | 3rd | -2 Points | |
Straight Aqua | 3rd | -1.8 Km/H | 97.54% |
Subj. Comfort | 2nd | -1 Points | |
Noise | 5th | +1.9 dB | 97.32% |
Price | 7th | 90 | 76.92% |
Rolling Resistance | 3rd | +0.22 kg / t | 97.44% |
Locul 2 – CONTINENTAL PremiumContact 6
TEST | Loc | Diferenta | % |
Dry Braking | 2nd | +0.4 M | 98.85% |
Dry Handling | 1st | 100% | |
Subj. Dry Handling | 1st | ||
Wet Braking | 2nd | +0.2 M | 99.52% |
Wet Handling | 9th | +1.1 s | 98.27% |
Subj. Wet Handling | 9th | -5 Points | |
Straight Aqua | 2nd | -1.6 Km/H | 97.82% |
Subj. Comfort | 2nd | -1 Points | |
Noise | 9th | +2.3 dB | 96.78% |
Price | 9th | 110 | 73.17% |
Rolling Resistance | 7th | +0.5 kg / t | 94.37% |
Locul 3 – Pirelli P Zero PZ4
TEST | Loc | Diferenta | % |
Dry Braking | 5th | +0.9 M | 97.44% |
Dry Handling | 6th | +0.4 s | 99.42% |
Subj. Dry Handling | 2nd | -1 Points | |
Wet Braking | 5th | +3.2 M | 92.9% |
Wet Handling | 1st | 100% | |
Subj. Wet Handling | 1st | ||
Straight Aqua | 10th | -5.1 Km/H | 93.04% |
Subj. Comfort | 5th | -2 Points | |
Noise | 2nd | +0.7 dB | 99% |
Price | 5th | 60 | 83.33% |
Rolling Resistance | 10th | +1.61 kg / t | 83.88% |
Locul 4 – MICHELIN Pilot Sport 4
TEST | Loc | Diferenta | % |
Dry Braking | 1st | 100% | |
Dry Handling | 2nd | +0.2 s | 99.71% |
Subj. Dry Handling | 2nd | -1 Points | |
Wet Braking | 4th | +2.9 M | 93.53% |
Wet Handling | 3rd | +0.5 s | 99.21% |
Subj. Wet Handling | 6th | -4 Points | |
Straight Aqua | 5th | -2.9 Km/H | 96.04% |
Subj. Comfort | 5th | -2 Points | |
Noise | 7th | +2 dB | 97.19% |
Price | 10th | 140 | 68.18% |
Rolling Resistance | 4th | +0.26 kg / t | 96.99% |
Locul 5 – FALKEN Azenis FK510
TEST | Loc | Diferenta | % |
Dry Braking | 6th | +1.1 M | 96.89% |
Dry Handling | 9th | +0.8 s | 98.85% |
Subj. Dry Handling | 9th | -5 Points | |
Wet Braking | 3rd | +0.9 M | 97.9% |
Wet Handling | 8th | +0.9 s | 98.58% |
Subj. Wet Handling | 5th | -3 Points | |
Straight Aqua | 4th | -2.7 Km/H | 96.32% |
Subj. Comfort | 5th | -2 Points | |
Noise | 4th | +1.3 dB | 98.15% |
Price | 3rd | 40 | 88.24% |
Rolling Resistance | 8th | +0.85 kg / t | 90.79% |
Locul 6 – NOKIAN PowerProof
TEST | Loc | Diferenta | % |
Dry Braking | 6th | +1.1 M | 96.89% |
Dry Handling | 6th | +0.4 s | 99.42% |
Subj. Dry Handling | 6th | -2 Points | |
Wet Braking | 6th | +4.7 M | 89.91% |
Wet Handling | 2nd | +0.3 s | 99.52% |
Subj. Wet Handling | 2nd | -1 Points | |
Straight Aqua | 6th | -3.4 Km/H | 95.36% |
Subj. Comfort | 5th | -2 Points | |
Noise | 10th | +2.8 dB | 96.11% |
Price | 2nd | 10 | 96.77% |
Rolling Resistance | 5th | +0.28 kg / t | 96.77% |
Locul 7 – MAXXIS Victra Sport 5
TEST | Loc | Diferenta | % |
Dry Braking | 3rd | +0.5 M | 98.56% |
Dry Handling | 2nd | +0.2 s | 99.71% |
Subj. Dry Handling | 2nd | -1 Points | |
Wet Braking | 8th | +7.8 M | 84.31% |
Wet Handling | 4th | +0.6 s | 99.05% |
Subj. Wet Handling | 3rd | -2 Points | |
Straight Aqua | 9th | -3.8 Km/H | 94.82% |
Subj. Comfort | 5th | -2 Points | |
Noise | 5th | +1.9 dB | 97.32% |
Price | 6th | 70 | 81.08% |
Rolling Resistance | 6th | +0.4 kg / t | 95.44% |
Locul 8 – DUNLOP SportMaxx RT2
TEST | Loc | Diferenta | % |
Dry Braking | 10th | +1.9 M | 94.75% |
Dry Handling | 10th | +0.9 s | 98.71% |
Subj. Dry Handling | 10th | -6 Points | |
Wet Braking | 7th | +6.8 M | 86.04% |
Wet Handling | 5th | +0.7 s | 98.89% |
Subj. Wet Handling | 6th | -4 Points | |
Straight Aqua | 1st | 100% | |
Subj. Comfort | 2nd | -1 Points | |
Noise | 2nd | +0.7 dB | 99% |
Price | 8th | 100 | 75% |
Rolling Resistance | 1st | 100% |
Locul 9 – HANKOOK Ventus S1 Evo 3
TEST | Loc | Diferenta | % |
Dry Braking | 8th | +1.2 M | 96.62% |
Dry Handling | 4th | +0.3 s | 99.57% |
Subj. Dry Handling | 7th | -3 Points | |
Wet Braking | 10th | +8.7 M | 82.81% |
Wet Handling | 5th | +0.7 s | 98.89% |
Subj. Wet Handling | 6th | -4 Points | |
Straight Aqua | 7th | -3.5 Km/H | 95.23% |
Subj. Comfort | 10th | -3 Points | |
Noise | 8th | +2.1 dB | 97.05% |
Price | 4th | 50 | 85.71% |
Rolling Resistance | 2nd | +0.12 kg / t | 98.59% |
Locul 10 – NEXEN N Fera Sport SU2
TEST | Loc | Diferenta | % |
Dry Braking | 8th | +1.2 M | 96.62% |
Dry Handling | 8th | +0.6 s | 99.14% |
Subj. Dry Handling | 8th | -4 Points | |
Wet Braking | 9th | +8.2 M | 83.63% |
Wet Handling | 10th | +2.3 s | 96.46% |
Subj. Wet Handling | 10th | -7 Points | |
Straight Aqua | 8th | -3.6 Km/H | 95.09% |
Subj. Comfort | 1st | ||
Noise | 1st | 100% | |
Price | 1st | 100% | |
Rolling Resistance | 9th | +0.89 kg / t | 90.4% |
Pentru a fi la curent cu ultimele stiri si noutati din domeniul anvelopelor auto, nu ezitati sa ne urmariti in continuare pe testanvelope.ro
1 Response
[…] Mai jos regasesti anvelopele testate cu legatura directa catre oferta noastra de pe AnvelopeMAG.ro. Pentru mai multe detalii despre acest test si anvelopele testate, viziteaza testanvelope.ro. […]